<aside> 🖼️
Overview
<aside> 💡
Investor Takeaway
<aside> 🔮
Prediction
<aside> 🥊
Competitive ranking
<aside> 📈
Key Growth Drivers
<aside> ⚠️
Key Downsides
Tinder MAUs showed no much improvement in Q2 2025: MAUs declined 8–9% year-over-year according to management, broadly unchanged from the 9% decline seen in each of the past five quarters (row 12): ‣
Management’s Q2 2025 commentary on improving MAU trends at Tinder are to be taken with a grain of salt since they were wrong in Q4 2024 and Q3 2024.
Reviews on Tinder are largely negative, with most users flagging increased fake profiles/bots and algorithm that seems to work only when you are a free user but stops after paying.
Large number of fake profiles in Tinder inflates the MAUs: A judge said in 2021 (citing anonymous witness) that 20% of accounts in Tinder are fake. Similarly, dating surveys (row 244) indicate users are concerned about encountering bots on dating apps.
Tinder’s Face Check feature that is being rolled out across regions (so far available in India, Canada, California (USA), Australia and Columbia) will likely be a headwind on monthly active users in the near-term. Some reviews say the feature is buggy and Tinder bans your profile if you don’t pass the photo and video verification.
More than 50% of Tinder MAUs (around 20M) come from low-monetizing regions (as per Sensor Tower, row 39). Match Group’s average revenue per payer in APAC& Other regions is about 30% lower than that of US and about 20% lower than that of Europe:
There are several Gen Z pain points when it comes to dating apps including lack of authenticity, fear of rejection, safety, etc. Solving these pain points might take time.
Important notes on the data above
More notes
Related Task: ‣
Related Decision: ‣