<aside> 🤔

Interpretations

Variant A) Large stakeholder (including founder) do not believe in company and want to hedge their bets by getting money upfront and reducing their stakes

Variant B) Mainly Blackstone (major shareholders) want to get out as they lost faith. Founders sees it as an opportunity to buy back liabilities at more than 50% return and genuinely simplify things for the company (but: in this process she old also had to agree to sell her own TRA liabilities - at the same discount)

→ Overall logic: The more successful the company is the better it is to buy out liabilities. (Buyers perspective) Or the higher the risk of the company failing the better it is to sell the liabilities. (Sellers perspective)

</aside>

Maybe there was payment in 2024 (10-K p.96) of around 20m? but would require more research

Aron’s assessment: The TRA buyout which carried 50% discount and whose payments ($27-59 million per year for 15 years) could signal that insiders are cautious on the company’s future profitability?

Q2 2025 management notes on TRA: